Technical Frameworks

Frameworks for
AI Decision Control

Technical frameworks for demonstrating runtime oversight, decision reconstruction, and operational evidence in regulated AI systems.

Featured Framework

Decision Context Record™

The Decision Context Record™ is a structured evidentiary framework for reconstructing AI-assisted healthcare decisions and demonstrating effective human oversight under Article 14 of the EU AI Act.

Executive Summary

The evidence gap in AI-assisted decisions.

Healthcare AI organizations can often demonstrate that a decision occurred. Far fewer can reconstruct the conditions under which that decision was made.

The Decision Context Record™ addresses this evidence gap by capturing the minimum operational context required to reconstruct an AI-assisted decision after it has occurred.

The framework is designed for healthcare AI companies, SaMD providers, quality and regulatory leaders, product teams, and organizations preparing for EU AI Act Article 14 implementation.

Framework Components

The Six Components of a Decision Context Record™

Each component captures a discrete category of operational evidence required to reconstruct an AI-assisted decision in full.

AI Output Context

Recommendation, classification, prediction, confidence score, probability estimate, model version, inference timestamp.

Human Context

Reviewer identity, role, authorization level, professional qualifications, organizational responsibility.

Decision Environment

Patient information, supporting clinical evidence, risk indicators, warnings, alerts, explanatory content displayed.

Intervention Context

Available actions, override options, escalation pathways, request for additional review.

Decision Outcome

Accepted, overridden, modified, escalated, or deferred decision outcome.

Interaction Evidence

Timestamps, interaction sequence, response latency, user actions, workflow navigation events.

Reconstruction Test

The Decision Reconstruction Test™

The framework introduces a practical test for oversight evidence:

“Could an independent reviewer reconstruct this decision six months later?”

Recommendation
Reconstruction

Context
Reconstruction

Intervention
Reconstruction

Responsibility
Reconstruction

Oversight
Reconstruction

Maturity Model

Operational Oversight Maturity Model™

Five levels of operational evidence maturity for AI-assisted decision-making in regulated environments.

Level 1

Approval Logging

A decision occurred.

Level 2

Decision Traceability

The organization knows what was decided.

Level 3

Context Capture

The surrounding decision context is partially captured.

Level 4

Decision Reconstruction

The full decision event can be reconstructed.

Level 5

Verifiable Oversight

The organization can independently demonstrate effective oversight.

Regulatory Relevance

Designed for evidence generation in regulated AI environments.

The framework is designed to support evidence generation for effective human oversight and decision reconstruction in regulated healthcare AI environments.

EU AI Act Article 14 MDR GSPR 14.2(d) IEC 62304 ISO 14971 SaMD Clinical Decision Support
Notice

The Decision Context Record™ is not a complete compliance solution and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. It addresses a specific evidential gap: the operational proof required to demonstrate oversight at the point of AI-assisted decision-making. Organizations should seek independent legal and regulatory counsel for specific compliance matters.

Oversight Evidence Readiness

Assess your oversight
evidence readiness

If your AI system supports clinical decisions, the critical question is not only whether a human remains in the loop. It is whether the organization can demonstrate what happened at the point of decision.